View Single Post
Old 02-18-2007, 11:11 AM   #20 (permalink)
brad15
Cell Phoner
 
brad15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 66
Points: 1,472, Level: 21
Points: 1,472, Level: 21 Points: 1,472, Level: 21 Points: 1,472, Level: 21
Level up: 72%, 28 Points needed
Level up: 72% Level up: 72% Level up: 72%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to brad15 Send a message via Yahoo to brad15
Quote:
Originally Posted by PixieBaby473 View Post
Maybe it's just the area I'm in, but I've had a Samsung a620, an a740 (twice) and an a920. All 3 of those always got better reception than my Sanyo 8200, hubby's Sanyo 7400, my LG PM325. (just to name a few.)
I've had several different Nokia phones, and all of them had crappy reception.
Like I said, maybe it's just my area, but that's been my experience.
I dont believe the Samsung topping Sanyo for reception, but i can believe the LG, although i loved my LG 5350 when i had Sprint, the RF left a little bit to be desired but still beat every samsung that i had owned!

I think my Samsung a870 on verizon does alright, definately better than the CDMA LG's, and Pantech/Audiovox crap, but they still do not beat the Moto!
brad15 is offline   Reply With Quote